People in conversation

Cross-Continental Collaboration on Shared Conflict: A University Classroom Case Study

Photo of two students walking in front of a stone building with pillars and a tree

“The way they were leading dialogues with each other, they became more curious and asked thoughtful questions. It really changed the atmosphere within the classroom. Besides making it more sophisticated and more engaging, it actually gave a different lens for the students in their thinking.”

In an academic world often defined by contentious debates and entrenched positions, two political scientists, one in the United States, the other in Turkey, have pioneered a collaborative, dialogic approach to teaching the complexities of Middle Eastern politics.

Dr. Sebnem Gumuscu, Associate Professor of Political Science at Middlebury College, and Dr. Ilkim Okyar, Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and International Relations at Yeditepe University in Istanbul, co-designed a unique course that connected their respective classrooms. Together, they provided students with a safe, yet brave space to humanize difference and grapple with polarizing issues through the methods of Essential Partners.

The journey for Dr. Gumuscu began with a vulnerable realization: she was avoiding teaching some of the most critical subjects in her field.

"In the past, I saved the topic of Israel and Palestine for outside speakers,” Dr. Gumuscu explained. “Although I knew the topic quite well, I would not teach it myself because I was not confident that I had the skills to manage conflict inside the classroom, so this is really coming from a vulnerable point. I thought, ‘that's not sustainable, I want to do better."

In 2021, a faculty-driven initiative at Middlebury—the Engaged Listening Program (ELP)—provided the opportunity she was seeking. Through ELP, Dr. Gumuscu received a two-day training in Reflective Structured Dialogue (RSD) from Essential Partners. With ongoing support through Essential Partners, she successfully integrated RSD into her courses.

Immediate and Profound Impact

The impact was immediate and profound: "After that semester, I could not go back to regular teaching," Dr. Gumuscu recalls. She then became a key figure in Middlebury’s Conflict Transformation Collaborative, managing the undergraduate pillar and professional development program, and further deepening her expertise by training as an EP practitioner at a Summer Intensive. The CTC seeks to foster individuals’ and groups’ knowledge about conflict vis-à-vis change; skills to engage productively with conflict and change; and dispositions that promote meaningful relationships and ethical action across communities. 

This foundational work paved the way for the crucial collaboration. Dr. Gumuscu connected with Dr. Okyar, whose academic background includes a PhD focused on the Middle East and years of experience engaging with peace activists and organizations in Palestine, Bedouin, and Israel.

Dr. Okyar shared her transformative experiences attending an annual Peace Platform organized by these activists. This initiative annually brings together diverse groups—including people from Israel and Palestine, spiritual leaders, and youth groups—to stay together in the desert, cooking, dancing, and hosting workshops on the power of dialogue.

"And seeing that firsthand, with the same land, we’re smelling the same air, we laugh the same way, cry the same way, sleeping in beds next to each other, it changes things. It degrades the entire political arguments into nothing. It was a life-changing experience," Dr. Okyar shared.

This shared understanding—that directly humanizing the "other" is essential for conflict transformation—made the overlap between Dr. Okyar’s practitioner experience and Dr. Gumuscu’s dialogic methods clear. They realized that by uniting these two expertise, they could offer students an alternative narrative to the conflicts in the Middle East.

Bringing Humanizing Experiences to Campus

The original plan to take both sets of students to the peace conference was unfortunately canceled due to the events of October 7th. The professors quickly pivoted, focusing instead on how to bring those humanizing experiences into their campuses.

Using techniques adapted from RSD and leveraging the Essential Partners Israel-Palestine Dialogue Guide, they co-created an entire college course.

  • Essential Partners’ methods were infused into the entire course structure, starting on day one with community agreements and carefully crafted connecting questions.
  • Dr. Gumuscu noted: “We built a progressive engagement with dialogic skills for the students, starting small with lower stakes, and then building those stakes with more contentious conversations.”
  • Students from Middlebury and Yeditepe University were connected throughout the semester, engaging regularly in work that enriched their understanding of how their peers, from different social and political environments, were grappling with the conflict.

The course successfully synthesized Dr. Gumuscu’s experience with EP and course design with Dr. Okyar’s connections to peace activists and firsthand knowledge of conflict transformation in the region. Dr. Okyar noticed the results right away.

“The way they were leading dialogues with each other, they became more curious and asked thoughtful questions,” remarked Dr. Okyar. “It really changed the atmosphere within the classroom. Besides making it more sophisticated and more engaging, it actually gave a different lens for the students in their thinking.”

The course became highly popular, a testament to students’ desire to engage with difference. Dr. Gumuscu noted its immense staying power: “their eyes were so bright when they're talking about the course itself... And they're telling me that was the best course ever.”

This deep impact solidified the professors’ commitment to the dialogic method. “After infusing EP’s methods into the course design, I can never, ever teach this course in a traditional style again,” Dr. Gumuscu concluded, to which Dr. Okyar wholeheartedly agreed, “Yeah, no way.”

Their work stands as a powerful example of how taking a risk and embracing structured dialogue can transform the classroom into a space of deep, humanizing learning, and encourage others to believe in the worth of this approach.